Uranium: Kazakhstan Effect May Be Transitory, EU Policy May Be Critical


Russia and America are in high-profile talks to defuse tensions over NATO boundaries and Ukraine (which holds a Credit Consensus Rating (“CCR”) of b-), but the Russian intervention in Kazakhstan (CCR of bbb-) has attracted less attention. Russia clearly sees the country as strategically important and part of its sphere of influence. The vast former Soviet republic provides more than 40% of the world’s uranium supply, mainly via state-owned Kazatomprom. Uranium prices and uranium mining firm equities both jumped in early January as the situation in Kazakhstan deteriorated, although the effect was short-lived.

The Russian intervention does highlight the global importance of uranium supplies for military and power generation purposes. While a growing list of developed countries are turning towards obviously sustainable and clean technologies, there is a two-way pull on nuclear. China is planning to build 150 nuclear reactors in the next 15 years, while France, along with some of the Eastern EU countries, is arguing that nuclear energy should be included in the “clean” taxonomy. If that goes ahead, then the geopolitics of uranium supply will begin to shift. And for some emerging and frontier economies, reliable and cheap energy from nuclear is already a more tempting option than the sustainable alternatives. Currently trading at $45/lb, uranium is up from a low of $20 in 2018.

In addition to Kazatomprom, major uranium producers are Cameco, BHP, Orano, Rio Tinto, Swakop (Namibian j.v. with China), CNNC and CGN (China), and Uranium One (Russian owned, Canada operated). Some of these are unrated by major CRAs, but most of them have a CCR, ranging from a+ to bb+. Credit consensus trends are stable to slightly positive.

The chart below shows the trend for Orano, which has mines in Canada and Niger, as well as a joint venture with Kazatomprom [please continue below to access full report].

Figure 1: Credit Trend, Orano SA


Please complete your details to continue reading this report:

    By clicking the "Submit" button, you are agreeing to the Credit Benchmark Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Download Full Report
    Sovereign Bond Risk Management

    In the current low yield environment, many Sovereign bonds issued by different countries are priced at similar levels. However, this Read more

    Introduction For Credit Portfolio Managers

    Credit Benchmark is a market-led response to three of the most critical issues facing credit risk professionals: 1) The need to Read more

    Sovereign Default Risk In Developing Economies

    This paper examines the use cases for Credit Benchmark’s Consensus Probabilities of Default (Consensus PDs), in the context of more Read more

    Impact Of BCBS Proposals On IRB Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently published wide-reaching proposals for reducing variation in Credit Risk Weighted Assets, with a Read more


    Follow us on:

    Credit Benchmark brings together internal credit risk views from over 40 leading global financial institutions. The contributions are anonymized, aggregated, and published in the form of consensus ratings and aggregate analytics to provide an independent, real-world perspective of credit risk. Risk and investment professionals at banks, insurance companies, asset managers and other financial firms use the data for insights into the unrated, monitoring and alerting within their portfolios, benchmarking, assessing and analyzing trends, and fulfilling regulatory requirements and capital.