Economics Nobel Prize Highlights Credit Risk as “Crucial Information”

Download PDF

The recent award of the 2022 Nobel memorial prize in Economics to Bernanke, Diamond and Dybvig for their work on banking regulation and liquidity is well-timed. As the era of low interest rates draws to a close in the face of post-Covid adjustments and international tensions, it is a reminder that the global financial system has already weathered the 2008/9 crisis and the pandemic, largely thanks to the insights from these economists.

Government intervention in financial markets is rising – power company bailouts (Europe), currency intervention (Japan), record reverse repos to absorb excess investor cash (US Fed) and direct buying of Government bonds (UK). These are signs of stress as investors and business adjust to a high inflation / high interest rate environment. This stress has had a knock-on effect to funds – whether it is banks having to rein in lending to hedge funds, pension funds cutting their interest rate swap exposure, or mutual funds having to manage withdrawals (and halting them in the case of some illiquid property funds).

Figure 1 shows the credit distribution for global funds.

Detailed consensus credit data is available on Bloomberg or via the CB Web App, covering many otherwise unrated companies. To arrange a demo of all single name and aggregate data detailed in this report, please request this by sending us an email.

Figure 1: Credit Distribution of Global Funds, Aug-22

Sovereign Wealth funds ($10trn) are concentrated in the a category; Pension Funds ($50trn) dominate the aa category. Mutual funds ($45trn) are spread across aa and a, while Hedge Funds ($5trn) are predominantly in the bb category.

One of the key insights from the Nobel Prize Winners is this: “A bank crash leads to loss of crucial information that banks acquire (and can pass on to others) on savers and borrowers. Without such assurances about the credit-worthiness of businesses and households, liquidity cannot be quickly re-established”. This highlights the connection between credit and liquidity, making the point that credit assessments are a form of market information.

Consensus ratings published by Credit Benchmark are, in effect, the same “crucial information” that Bernanke, Diamond and Dybvig describe, contributed monthly by 40+ large banks. Current coverage extends to more than 60,000 legal entities; half of that is in funds, the once overlooked and unrated but now increasingly critical element in global financial plumbing.

Enjoyed this report? If you’d like to see more consensus-based credit ratings, mid-point probabilities of default and detailed analytics on 60,000+ public and private global entities, please complete your details to start a trial or to request a coverage check:

    By clicking the "Submit" button, you are agreeing to the Credit Benchmark Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Sovereign Bond Risk Management

    In the current low yield environment, many Sovereign bonds issued by different countries are priced at similar levels. However, this Read more

    Introduction For Credit Portfolio Managers

    Credit Benchmark is a market-led response to three of the most critical issues facing credit risk professionals: 1) The need to Read more

    Sovereign Default Risk In Developing Economies

    This paper examines the use cases for Credit Benchmark’s Consensus Probabilities of Default (Consensus PDs), in the context of more Read more

    Impact Of BCBS Proposals On IRB Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently published wide-reaching proposals for reducing variation in Credit Risk Weighted Assets, with a Read more

    Follow us on:

    Credit Benchmark brings together internal credit risk views from over 40 leading global financial institutions. The contributions are anonymized, aggregated, and published in the form of consensus ratings and aggregate analytics to provide an independent, real-world perspective of credit risk. Risk and investment professionals at banks, insurance companies, asset managers and other financial firms use the data for insights into the unrated, monitoring and alerting within their portfolios, benchmarking, assessing and analyzing trends, and fulfilling regulatory requirements and capital.