Impairment Trends: Consensus Point-in-Time Curves

Download the full whitepaper below.

  • The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted how sensitive banks impairment numbers are to changes in the economy.
  • PIT PD curves have increased substantially across all industries.
  • Banks have changed their PIT PD curves quicker and more severely than their TTC PDs.
  • Banks have increased the severity of their forward-looking downturn scenarios.
Figure 1.1 shows the average cumulative PIT PD curves up to 5 years across different industries. The results from March show that banks did start to recognise the increase in credit risk from the COVID-19 crisis in Q1, with the orange line generally higher than the 2018 and 2019 PDs.

The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted how sensitive banks’ impairment numbers are to changes in the economy. Under IFRS9 accounting rules, banks have to hold impairment now against their future expected credit losses. When countries shut down large parts of their economies due to COVID-19, banks had to react quickly to reassess the increase in the current and future credit risk of their portfolio.

Many banks’ recent half year results show substantial increases in their impairment provisions and the impact this has on their profits.

A key component of banks’ IFRS9 impairment calculation is their point-in-time (PIT) Probability of Default (PD) estimates that reflect their prediction of the economic impact on credit risk forecasts forward in time. Higher PIT PDs lead to higher impairment, both directly through the formula for expected credit losses (ECL) and through loans migrating from a 1 year ECL to a lifetime ECL. If banks hold more impairment it reduces their funds available for lending, which can in turn impact the economy causing a negative feedback loop.

In this report, we use aggregated PIT PD curves to look at the impact COVID-19 has had on banks’ forecasts of credit risk and impairment. Here we focus on the results from the UK banks contributing data to Credit Benchmark.

Download the latest whitepaper to read the full analysis:

    By clicking the "Submit" button, you are agreeing to the Credit Benchmark Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Download Whitepaper
    Sovereign Bond Risk Management

    In the current low yield environment, many Sovereign bonds issued by different countries are priced at similar levels. However, this Read more

    Introduction For Credit Portfolio Managers

    Credit Benchmark is a market-led response to three of the most critical issues facing credit risk professionals: 1) The need to Read more

    Sovereign Default Risk In Developing Economies

    This paper examines the use cases for Credit Benchmark’s Consensus Probabilities of Default (Consensus PDs), in the context of more Read more

    Impact Of BCBS Proposals On IRB Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently published wide-reaching proposals for reducing variation in Credit Risk Weighted Assets, with a Read more

    Follow us on:

    Credit Benchmark brings together internal credit risk views from over 40 leading global financial institutions. The contributions are anonymized, aggregated, and published in the form of consensus ratings and aggregate analytics to provide an independent, real-world perspective of credit risk. Risk and investment professionals at banks, insurance companies, asset managers and other financial firms use the data for insights into the unrated, monitoring and alerting within their portfolios, benchmarking, assessing and analyzing trends, and fulfilling regulatory requirements and capital.